A CONVERGENT THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION ACROSS CULTURAL CONTEXTS GLOBALLY
DOI:
10.47353/satukata.v4i1.4605Published:
2025-12-31Downloads
Abstract
Digital transformation has emerged as a critical driver of organizational change, yet its implementation and outcomes vary significantly across cultural contexts. Existing studies often treat technological adoption and cultural dynamics as separate domains, resulting in fragmented theoretical explanations. This article proposes a convergent theoretical framework that integrates digital transformation processes with cross-cultural perspectives to provide a holistic understanding of how organizations adapt to technological change globally. The framework synthesizes insights from institutional theory, socio-technical systems theory, and cultural dimensions theory to explain how cultural values, organizational structures, and technological infrastructures interact dynamically. Using a descriptive conceptual approach, this study identifies key dimensions influencing digital transformation across cultures, including power distance, uncertainty avoidance, digital readiness, and organizational learning capacity. The findings suggest that digital transformation is not merely a technological process but a culturally embedded phenomenon shaped by social norms, leadership styles, and institutional pressures. The proposed framework highlights the importance of cultural alignment in ensuring successful digital transformation initiatives and provides a multi-level analytical lens for researchers and practitioners. This study contributes to the literature by bridging the gap between digital transformation research and cross-cultural studies, offering a unified theoretical model that can guide future empirical research. Furthermore, it provides practical implications for multinational organizations seeking to implement digital strategies across diverse cultural environments. By emphasizing convergence rather than divergence, this framework advances a more integrative understanding of digital transformation in the global context.
Keywords:
Digital Transformation Cross-Cultural Framework Organizational ChangeReferences
Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2015). Integrating the organizational change literature: A model for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2), 234–262.
Avgerou, C. (2008). Information systems in developing countries: A critical research review. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 133–146.
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.
Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesböck, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 123–139.
Henfridsson, O., & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 907–931.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815.
Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 14(1), 1–25.
Leidner, D. E., & Kayworth, T. (2006). A review of culture in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 357–399.
Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies. Organization Science, 22(1), 147–167.
Lucas, H. C., Agarwal, R., Clemons, E. K., El Sawy, O. A., & Weber, B. (2013). Impactful research on transformational information technology. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 371–382.
Majchrzak, A., Markus, M. L., & Wareham, J. (2016). Designing for digital transformation. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 267–278.
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223–238.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Singh, N., Zhao, H., & Hu, X. (2005). Cultural adaptation on the web. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(2), 95–109.
Straub, D., Keil, M., & Brenner, W. (1997). Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures. MIS Quarterly, 21(1), 1–28.
Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. F. (2019). The technostress trifecta. Journal of Information Technology, 34(1), 6–42.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49.
Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Research commentary: Digital infrastructures. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748–759.
Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (2012). Riding the waves of culture. McGraw-Hill.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), 118–144.
Walsham, G. (2002). Cross-cultural software production and use. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 359–380.
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Review Press.
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary: The new organizing logic of digital innovation. Organization Science, 21(4), 724–735.
Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749–762.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 I Made Darsana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









