Publication Ethics

SATUKATA: Jurnal Sains, Teknik, dan Studi Kemasyarakatan (Journal of Science, Engineering, and Society) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of ethical conduct in publishing. The journal adheres to the ethical guidelines outlined below to ensure the integrity of the research it publishes and to promote the transparency and fairness of the review and publication process.

1. Ethical Principles

SATUKATA upholds the following ethical principles in all aspects of the publication process:

  • Integrity: All submissions to the journal should represent original, truthful, and accurate research. Authors must provide honest, well-reasoned arguments and must not engage in practices such as plagiarism, falsification, or fabrication of data.

  • Respect for Intellectual Property: Authors must properly cite all sources and prior works that have influenced their research. Any plagiarism or self-plagiarism will lead to immediate rejection of the submission.

  • Accountability: Authors, reviewers, and editors are responsible for upholding these ethical standards throughout the entire publication process.

2. Author Responsibilities

  • Originality: Authors must submit original works that have not been published elsewhere. Any work that contains material previously published must be cited appropriately.

  • Data Integrity: Authors must ensure that the data presented is accurate and transparent. If necessary, authors must make raw data available upon request.

  • Multiple Submissions: Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal is considered unethical. Authors should ensure that a manuscript is submitted exclusively to SATUKATA until the review process is complete.

  • Authorship: All individuals who have contributed significantly to the research should be credited as authors. Any individual who has contributed in some way should be acknowledged appropriately.

  • Conflicts of Interest: Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the research, interpretation of results, or the publication process.

3. Reviewer Responsibilities

  • Impartiality: Reviewers should evaluate manuscripts fairly and impartially, without personal bias or conflicts of interest. If reviewers feel they cannot provide an unbiased review, they should decline to review the manuscript.

  • Confidentiality: Reviewers must keep the manuscript and its contents confidential. They should not share, discuss, or use the manuscript for personal advantage.

  • Constructive Feedback: Reviewers should provide constructive and respectful feedback, helping authors improve the quality of their manuscripts.

  • Timeliness: Reviewers are expected to complete their reviews promptly and adhere to the deadlines set by the editorial team.

4. Editor Responsibilities

  • Fairness: Editors are responsible for making unbiased decisions on manuscript acceptance or rejection based on the quality of the work, regardless of the author's gender, race, nationality, or institutional affiliation.

  • Confidentiality: Editors must maintain confidentiality of the manuscripts during the entire publication process. Manuscripts will not be shared with others except reviewers, authors, and other involved parties.

  • Transparency and Accountability: Editors must ensure transparency in the review process. They are responsible for addressing any potential conflicts of interest and ensuring that proper procedures are followed.

  • Timely Publication: Editors should aim to publish content in a timely manner, keeping authors informed of the status of their manuscript.

5. Publishing Ethics and Best Practices

  • Peer Review Process: The journal ensures that all submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to evaluate the quality, originality, and significance of the work.

  • Correcting Errors: If errors are discovered in published articles, either by the author or through the review process, the journal is committed to correcting the record promptly by issuing errata or retractions, as appropriate.

  • Publication Retraction: If a published article is found to have significant issues, such as falsified data or plagiarism, it will be retracted, and the reason for retraction will be clearly stated in a public notice.

6. Conflict of Interest

  • Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could affect the objectivity of their work or their review process. This includes financial interests, affiliations, or personal relationships that could influence the outcomes of the publication process.

7. Handling Complaints

  • SATUKATA has a clear procedure for handling complaints regarding unethical practices, such as plagiarism or unethical behavior in the review process. Any concerns raised by authors or reviewers will be taken seriously and addressed promptly.

  • Complaints can be directed to the editorial team, who will investigate the matter in accordance with established ethical guidelines.

By adhering to these publication ethics, SATUKATA ensures the integrity, transparency, and credibility of the research it publishes, fostering a trusted and respected academic environment.