RELIABILITAS ALAT UKUR DYADIC COPING INVENTORY
Main Article Content
Amorita Christella Anggamsari
Fitri Andriani
Adanya peningkatan jumlah kasus perceraian di Indonesia sebagian besar disebabkan oleh ‘konflik yang tidak terselesaikan antara pasangan suami-istri’, padahal pola komunikasi dan strategi koping yang digunakan oleh keduanya dapat mempengaruhi tumbuh kembang anak. Dyadic coping dapat menjadi faktor protektif dan dapat memprediksi tingkat kepuasan dari sebuah hubungan (relationship). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui reliabilitas dari alat ukur Dyadic Coping Inventory versi Bahasa Indonesia. Pengambilan data dilakukan secara online dan melibatkan 104 partisipan. Reliabilitas alat ukur dianalisis menggunakan Jamovi. Hasil analisis menunjukkan koefisien Alpha Cronbach DCI sebesar 0,931. Sementara reliabilitas per dimensi berkisar dari 0,53 hingga 0,95, dan nilai item-rest correlation berada di atas 0,25. Hasil pilot study menunjukkan bahwa alat ukur DCI versi Bahasa Indonesia terbilang cukup reliabel dan dapat digunakan pada penelitian selanjutnya.
Annur, C. M. (2021). Sebanyak 73,70% Istri Menggugat Cerai Suaminya pada 2020. Retrieved April 7, 2022, from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/ website: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/02/03/sebanyak-7370-istri-menggugat-cerai-suaminya-pada-2020
Annur, C. M. (2022). Kasus Perceraian Meningkat 53%, Mayoritas karena Pertengkaran. Retrieved April 7, 2022, from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/ website: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/02/28/kasus-perceraian-meningkat-53-mayoritas-karena-pertengkaran#:~:text=Angka Perceraian di Indonesia (2017-2021)&text=Menurut laporan Statistik Indonesia%2C jumlah,banyak menggugat cerai ketimbang suami.
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (4th ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadic Coping Inventory: Test Manual. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
Boyce, W. T. (2019). The Orchid and The Dandelion: Why Sensitive People Struggle and How All Can Thrive. Colorado: Bluebird.
Cutrona, C., Bodenmann, G., Randall, A. K., Clavel, F. K., & Johnson, M. (2018). Stress, Dyadic Coping, and Social Support: Moving toward Integration. In The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (2nd ed., pp. 341–352). https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/9781316417867.027
Dermawan, S., Goei, Y. A., & Kirana, K. C. (2015). Pengaruh Dyadic Coping terhadap Kepuasan Pernikahan pada Pasangan Menikah di Tangerang. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 2(2), 420–433. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.24854/jpu22015-37
Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002
Gasbarrini, M. F., Snyder, D. K., Iafrate, R., Bertoni, A., Donato, S., & Margola, D. (2015). Investigating the relation between shared stressors and marital satisfaction: The moderating effects of dyadic coping and communication. Family Science, 6(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2015.1082044
Ghozali, I. (2018). Structural equation modelling: Teori, konsep dan aplikasi dengan program lisrel 9.10, edisi 4. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning EMEA.
Herzberg, P. Y. (2013). Coping in relationships: The interplay between individual and dyadic coping and their effects on relationship satisfaction. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 26(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2012.655726
International Test Commisions. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests [Second Edition]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1975.tb00322.x
Jayani, D. H. (2021). Perselisihan Jadi Penyebab Utama Perceraian Sepanjang 2020. Retrieved April 7, 2022, from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/ website: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/03/19/perselisihan-jadi-penyebab-utama-perceraian-sepanjang-2020
Kanth, B., Randall, A. K., Bodenmann, G., & Indumathy, J. (2021). Partners’ Dyadic Coping in India: Psychometric Properties and Validity of the Tamil Version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory. Marriage & Family Review, 1–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2021.1936743
Kayser, K., & Bodenmann, G. (2005). Couples Coping with Stress: Emerging Perspective on Dyadic Coping (T. A. Revenson, Ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2005). Parental imprisonment: effects on boys’ antisocial behaviour and delinquency through the life-course. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(12), 1269–1278. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01433.x
Nepomuceno, W. R., Goncalves, A. da S., & Hernandez, J. A. E. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the Dyadic Coping Inventory: Systematic Review. Interpersona, 16(1), 96–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.7597
Rusu, P. P., Hilpert, P., Turliuc, M. N., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). Dyadic Coping in an Eastern European Context: Validity and Measurement Invariance of the Romanian Version of Dyadic Coping Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49(4), 274–285. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/0748175616664009
Scaglioni, S., De Cosmi, V., Ciappolinno, V., Parazzini, F., Brambilla, P., & Agostoni, C. (2018). Factors Influencing Children’s Eating Behaviours. Nutrients, 10(6), 706. https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/nu10060706
World Health Organization. (2004). ICD-10 : international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (2nd ed.). World Health Organization.
