KAPASITAS BIROKRASI DALAM ADAPTASI SISTEM DIGITAL PADA PELAYANAN KEPROTOKOLAN
DOI:
10.54443/sibatik.v5i2.4299Published:
2026-01-30Downloads
Abstract
The digitalization of public administration has encouraged changes in the management of local government protocol services, yet the adaptation process often encounters structural and cultural challenges within the bureaucracy. This article aims to analyze bureaucratic capacity in adapting digital systems in local government protocol services. The study employs a qualitative approach using a literature review method by examining scientific articles, books, and policy documents relevant to digital transformation, bureaucratic capacity, and public service management. The analysis focuses on identifying key factors that influence the ability of bureaucratic institutions to respond effectively to digital change. The results indicate that bureaucratic capacity is shaped by the quality of human resources, institutional commitment, leadership orientation, organizational culture, and the availability of technological infrastructure. Limited technical competence, resistance to organizational change, weak coordination among organizational units, and insufficient capacity-building programs emerge as major constraints in the adaptation process. These conditions affect the effectiveness and consistency of digital-based protocol services. The study concludes that the success of digital adaptation in protocol services is not solely determined by technological adoption, but also by the strengthening of bureaucratic capacity through sustainable institutional development and cultural transformation. This article provides a conceptual contribution for local governments in designing strategies to enhance bureaucratic readiness in managing digital-based protocol services.
Keywords:
Bureaucratic Capacity Digital Transformation Protocol Services Local Government Literature ReviewReferences
Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action. Oxford University Press.
Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2017). Managing performance: International comparisons. Routledge.
(Digunakan untuk penguatan kapasitas birokrasi dan kinerja sektor publik)
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
(Buku utama metodologi kualitatif dan literature review)
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 524–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.03.002
Mergel, I. (2018). Open innovation in the public sector: Drivers and barriers for the adoption of challenge.gov. Public Management Review, 20(5), 726–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1320044
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – Into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. World Bank Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wahyu Muharomdoni, Yuli Setyowati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
