THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL MONEY TURNOVER VELOCITY ON THE INDONESIAN ECONOMY
Main Article Content
This study investigates the impact of digital money turnover velocity on the Indonesian economy, focusing on economic growth, inflation dynamics, employment, and financial inclusion. The primary objective is to understand how the rapid circulation of digital money influences key economic indicators and contributes to poverty reduction. Utilizing a qualitative research methodology, this study conducts a comprehensive literature review and employs a meta-analysis of existing empirical studies to synthesize findings related to digital money and economic performance. The analysis reveals that an increase in the velocity of digital money significantly enhances economic growth by improving transaction efficiency and stimulating consumption. However, it also presents potential challenges, such as contributing to inflationary pressures if not managed properly. The study also examines the labor market, highlighting that digital money facilitates job creation in fintech and digital services sectors while promoting financial inclusion by providing access to financial services for previously underserved populations. Furthermore, the findings underscore the critical role of financial literacy in maximizing the benefits of digital money. Enhanced financial literacy ensures that individuals can effectively manage and utilize digital financial services, leading to better financial outcomes and economic empowerment. The research suggests that policy interventions aimed at promoting digital financial services, coupled with comprehensive financial literacy programs, can significantly contribute to economic development and poverty reduction in Indonesia.
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.
Bank Indonesia. (2021). Annual Report.
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W.W. Norton & Company.
Burgess, R., & Pande, R. (2005). Do Rural Banks Matter? Evidence from the Indian Social Banking Experiment. American Economic Review, 95(3), 780-795.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Klapper, L. (2013). Measuring Financial Inclusion: Explaining Variation in Use of Financial Services across and within Countries. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2013(1), 279-340.
Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring. Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393-414.
Duflo, E. (2012). Women Empowerment and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051-1079.
European Central Bank. (2019). The Impact of Digital Transformation on the Financial Sector.
European Central Bank. (2020). The Impact of Digitalisation on Inflation. ECB Occasional Paper Series.
Friedman, M. (1956). The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement. In Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. University of Chicago Press.
Grohmann, A., Klühs, T., & Menkhoff, L. (2018). Does Financial Literacy Improve Financial Inclusion? Cross Country Evidence. World Development, 111, 84-96.
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
IMF. (2018). Digitalization and the Future of Finance. International Monetary Fund.
IMF. (2020). Digital Money and Central Banking: Policy Issues. International Monetary Fund.
Jack, W., & Suri, T. (2014). Risk Sharing and Transactions Costs: Evidence from Kenya's Mobile Money Revolution. American Economic Review, 104(1), 183-223.
Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (2016). The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States, 1995-2015. NBER Working Paper No. 22667.
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report, EBSE.
McKinsey & Company. (2020). The Future of Work After COVID-19.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
Narayan, P. K., Phan, D. H. B., & Liu, G. (2020). COVID-19 lockdowns, stimulus packages, travel bans, and stock returns. Finance Research Letters, 101732.
OECD. (2019). OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work.
OECD. (2020). COVID-19 and the Future of Work.
OECD. (2020). Digital Disruption in Banking and its Impact on Competition.
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., & Britten, N. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme.
Rogoff, K. S. (2016). The Curse of Cash. Princeton University Press.
Sahay, R., von Allmen, U. E., Lahreche, A., Khera, P., Ogawa, S., Bazarbash, M., & Beaton, K. (2020). The Promise of Fintech: Financial Inclusion in the Post COVID-19 Era. International Monetary Fund.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Susanto, A. B., & Goodwin, R. (2020). Digital Financial Inclusion: The Adoption and Impact of Mobile Money in Indonesia. Asian Development Bank.
World Bank. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and the Fintech Revolution.
World Bank. (2019). The Digital Economy in Southeast Asia: Strengthening the Foundations for Future Growth.
World Bank. (2021). Digital Economy for Indonesia.