LOCAL POWER DYNAMICS: A CASE STUDY OF INTERACTIONS BETWEEN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND NON-STATE ACTORS
DOI:
10.54443/sibatik.v3i5.1940Published:
2024-04-30Downloads
Abstract
This study examines the dynamics of power interactions between local governments and non-state actors in a specific context. The research focuses on the relationships between local governments and non-state actors, such as civil society organizations, private companies, and community groups, to understand how these interactions shape local governance and policy outcomes. The case study is based on empirical research conducted in a selected city, where data was collected through interviews, surveys, and observations. The findings of the study reveal that power dynamics between local governments and non-state actors are complex and multifaceted. Local governments often rely on non-state actors for resources, expertise, and legitimacy, while non-state actors seek to influence policy decisions and access resources. The study highlights the importance of understanding these interactions to better comprehend the dynamics of local governance and policy outcomes. The research contributes to the existing literature on local governance and power dynamics by providing a nuanced understanding of the interactions between local governments and non-state actors. The findings have implications for policy makers, practitioners, and researchers seeking to improve local governance and policy outcomes.
Keywords:
local governance power dynamics non-state actors local governments policy outcomesReferences
Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Transnational climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 9(2), 52-73. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.2.52
Batley, R., & Rose, P. (2011). Analysing collaboration among non-government service providers in service non-poor areas of India. Public Administration and Development, 31(5), 348-358. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.609
Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2010). Governance without a state: Can it work? Regulation & Governance, 4(2), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01076.x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2011). Public-private partnerships: Perspectives on purpose, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.584
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Gaventa, J. (2006). Triumph, deficit or contestation? Deepening the 'deepening democracy' debate. IDS Working Paper 264. Institute of Development Studies.
Holzer, M., & Kloby, K. (2005). Sustaining citizen-driven performance improvement: Models for adoption and issues of sustainability in three Georgia counties. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 526-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2005.11051855
Josselin, D., & Wallace, W. (2001). Non-state actors in world politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kanie, N., Betsill, M. M., Zondervan, R., Biermann, F., & Young, O. R. (2020). A charter moment: Restructuring governance for sustainability. Public Administration and Development, 40(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1875
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Sage Publications.
Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M., & Bäck, H. (2016). Roles of non-state actors in governance patterns surrounding new energy vehicles in Sweden. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1526-1545. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1174199
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Purdue, D. (2001). Neighbourhood governance: Leadership, trust and social capital. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2211-2224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087153
Schäferhoff, M., Campe, S., & Kaan, C. (2009). Transnational public-private partnerships in international relations: Making sense of concepts, research frameworks, and results. International Studies Review, 11(3), 451-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2009.
Sending, O. J., & Neumann, I. B. (2006). Governance to governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, states, and power. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 651-672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00418.x
Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Wilson, M. (2005). The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public Administration, 83(3), 573-596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00463.x
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2017). Working across boundaries: Collaboration in public services. Palgrave Macmillan.
Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991-2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869
Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886303039001001
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zamzami A Karim, Edward Mandala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
