JUDGES' CONSIDERATIONS IN ISSUE-MAKING DECISIONS REGARDING THE LENGTH OF SENTENCES FOR PERPETRATORS OF CHILD INDEMNITY (STUDY OF LUBUKPAKAM DISTRICT COURT DECISION NO. 2044/PID.SUS/2021/PN.LBP JO MEDAN HIGH COURT DECISION NO. 2093/PID.SUS/2021/PT.MDN JO S
DOI:
10.54443/sibatik.v4i5.2723Published:
2025-04-30Downloads
Abstract
The perpetrators of child molestation crimes deserve to be given a fairly high sentence, for example, as stated in Law No. 17 of 2016 concerning Government Regulation in Law No. 1 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection into Law, where in Article 81 A paragraph (3) there is a criminal sanction in the form of chemical castration for perpetrators of child molestation. However, in reality, in law enforcement related to child molestation crimes where children are victims, not all perpetrators are given the maximum or severe sentence. The sentence given to perpetrators of child molestation crimes is reduced or not punished severely. This is as stated in the Decision of the LubukPakam District Court No. 2044/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Lbp Jo Decision of the Medan High Court No. 2093/Pid.Sus/2021/PT.Mdn Jo Decision of the Supreme Court No. 2909K/Pid.Sus/2022
Keywords:
Child Molestation Sentencing Decision Legal EnforcementReferences
Ananda, Fiska,”Penerapan Diversi Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana”, Dalam Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2, Maret 2018, Semarang: UNISSULA.
Anwar, Saiful Dan Mazuki Lubis, Sendi-Sendi Hukum Administrasi Negara, Medan: Gelora Madani Press, 2004.
Arto, Mukti, Praktek Perkara Perdata Pada Pengadilan Agama, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.
Asyhadie, Zaeni & Arief Rahman, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2016.
Ernis, Yul,”Diversi Dan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Anak Di Indonesia”, Dalam Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2, Juli 2016, Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum & HAM.
Gosita, Arief, Masalah Korban Kejahatan, Jakarta: Akademika Presindo, 1993.
Gultom, Maidin, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dan Perempuan, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2014.
Hadi, Kriminalisasi Anak, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2010.
Ilyas, Amir, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana: Memahami Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Sebagai Syarat Pemidanaan (Disertai Teori-Teori Pengantar Dan Beberapa Komentar), Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education Yogyakarta & PUKAP-Indonesia, 2012.
Kanter, EY. dan SR. Sianturi, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Dan Penerapannya, Jakarta: Storia Grafika, 2002.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Marlina, Pengantar Konsep Diversi Dan Restorative Justice Dalam Hukum Pidana, Medan: USU PRESS, 2010.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2002.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2909K/Pid.Sus/2022.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri LubukPakam No. 2044/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Lbp.
Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Medan No. 2093/Pid.Sus/2021/PT.Mdn.
Ramadhani, Fadel Muhammad, Kekuatan Hukum Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Pengangkatan Pejabat Kepala Daerah Dalam Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Jakarta: Fakultas Syariah & Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2024.
Soekanto, Soerjono, Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: Rajawali, 2014.
Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Waluyo, Bambang, Viktimologi: Perlindungan Saksi, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kevin Theodosus Spesio Panjaitan, Mahmud Mulyadi, Abdul Aziz Alsa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
