EKSPLORASI EFEK MODERASI DIMENSI BUDAYA TERHADAP PENERIMAAN TEKNOLOGI INTERNET MASYARAKAT YOGYAKARTA
Main Article Content
The most popular model of technology acceptance related to information technology is the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model originating from developed countries. If applied in developing countries, it may not be appropriate, given the different cultures. In this study, a technology acceptance model will be developed by incorporating cultural factors or dimensions to make it suitable for Indonesia. The cultural dimensions used are the dimensions found by Hofstede, namely Power Distance, Individualism, Masculinity, Long Term Orientation and User Avoidance. In this study the Masculinity dimension was not used because this dimension is not so visible in Indonesia. This research was conducted using quantitative methods, factor analysis and path analysis using Structure Equation Modelling. The cultural dimension is placed as a moderating variable. The results of this study, it was found that the cultural dimension of Power Distance had a positive effect on the relationship between Effort Expectancy and Behavioral Intention and between Performance Expectancy and Behavioral Intention.. The cultural dimension of Individualsm has a positive effect on the relationship between Effort Expectancy and Behavioral only. The cultural dimension of User Avoidance has a positive effect on the relationship between Social Infuence and Behavioral Intention. Social influence has a direct effect on Behavioral Intention, indicating that environmental factors really greatly influence the intention to use the internet.
Keywords: technology acceptance, cultural dimension, moderating variable
Baltzan, P., Phillips, A., Haag S. 2009. Business Driven Technology (3rd Edition).
Singapore: McGrawHill.
Davis, F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of
information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Straub, D.W. 1994. The Effect of Culture on IT Diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S.. Information Systems Research 5(1):23-47.
Freund and Weindhold. 2004. The effect of the Internet on international trade. Journal of International Economics, vol. 62, issue 1, 171-189
Ghozali, Imam. 2008. Structural Equation Modelling, Edisi II, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and
Organizations across Nations. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
Hofstede, G. 1993. Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management
Executive, 1, 81-94.
Hofstede, G. 1980 . Motivation, leadership, and organizations:do American theories apply
abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42-63.
Hofstede, G. and Bond, M. 1988. The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to
economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(1), 4-21.
Masiello, Betsy and Slater, Derek, Embracing an Innovation Stimulus Package (July 12, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2104350
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. 2007. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44, 90-103.
Sriwindono, Haris; Yahya, Salleh. 2014. The Influence of Cultural Dimension on ICT Acceptance in Indonesia Higher Learning Institution Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(5) Special 2014, Pages: 215-221
Straub, D.W, Keil, M., Bremer, W. 1997. Testing the technology acceptance model across
cultures: a three country study. Information & Management 33 (1), pp. I-11.
Veiga, LF. , Floyd, S., Dechant, K. 2001. Towards modeling the effects of national culture
on IT implementation and acceptance. Journal of Information technology, 16, 145158.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. 2003. User Acceptance of
Information Technology:Toward a Univfied View. MIS Quarterly 27, pp. 425-475.
Zuraida, R. Andam. 2003. E-commerce and e-business. E-Asean task force, UNDP-APDIP.