HASIL AUDIT DAN OPINI YANG DIHASILKAN SEHUBUNGAN MUNCULNYA TEMUAN KECURANGAN DAN PENGARUH PENGALAMAN AUDITOR
Main Article Content
Galih Kencana Putra Antariksa
This study examines the impact of fraud findings in procurement processes and the level of auditor experience on audit results, using a case study of Company X. Company X experienced significant financial performance changes in the form of increases, followed by fraud incidents during the audit period. The research employs a qualitative approach with data collected through interviews and examination of audit evidence. The findings indicate that significant fraud findings and the level of auditor experience critically influence the audit results and the opinion issued. The study emphasizes the importance of thorough and careful risk assessment and the need for auditors to adjust their audit strategies in response to new evidence, including fraud findings. Additionally, the research highlights the necessity for robust internal controls and the auditor's role in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of financial statements. The results suggest that when significant fraud is detected, auditors must reassess risks, adjust audit procedures, and issue an appropriate opinion that reflects the true state of the financial statements.
Albrecht, W. S., C. O. Albrecht, C. C. Albrecht, dan M. F.Zimbelman. 2012. Fraud Examination. 4th Edition. South-Western: Cengange Learning
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.2016. Financial Transactions and Fraud Schemes. Texas, United States: Association of Certified fraud Examiners
Cahyono, A. Y. (2017). Pengaruh ukuran kap (kantor akuntan publik), opini audit going concern dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap auditor switching pada perusahaan manufaktur periode 2013-2015. 1–14.
Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021). Standar Audit (SA) 700. Perumusan Suatu Opini dan Pelaporan Atas Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia.
Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021). Standar Audit (SA) 705. Modifikasi Terhadap Opini dalam Laporan Auditor Independen. Jakarta. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia.
Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021). Standar Audit (SA) 300. Perencanaan Suatu Audit atas Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia.
Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021). Standar Audit (SA) 315. Pengidentifikasian dan Penilaian Risiko Kesalahan Penyajian Material Melalui Pemahaman atas Entitas dan Lingkungannya. Jakarta. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia
Ismail, H. A., & Kurniawan, D. (2018). Penerapan Kode Etik Auditor dalam Menjaga Kerahasiaan Data Klien: Studi Kasus Kantor. Substansi, 2(2), 260–280.
Jensen and Meckling. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Management Behavior, Agency Cost ad Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. V.3, No. 4, pp. 305-360.
Juhara, D. (2017). Pengaruh Kode Etik Akuntan Publik Terhadap Kualitas Hasil Audit pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Bandung. Jurnal Riset Bisnis Dan Iptek, 10(2), 95–104.
Manossoh, H. (2017). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Fraud pada Pemerintah di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 4(1). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/emba/article/view/11649
Pristiyanti, I. R. (2012). Persepsi Pegawai Instansi Pemerintah Mengenai Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Fraud di Sektor Pemerintahan. Accounting Analysis Journal, 1(1), 1–14. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/aaj/article/view/707
Sarpta, R. B. (2018). Analisis Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Beneish M-Score Model (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014-2016). Universitas Bandar Lampung. Retrieved from http://digilib.unila.ac.id/31452/3/Skripsi Tanpa Bab Pembahasan.pdf
Umar, Haryono. (2016). Corruption The Devil. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Trisakti.
Zakaria, K. M., Nawawi, A., & Salin, A. S. A. P. (2016). Internal Controls and Fraud (Empirical Evidence From Oil & Gas Company). Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 1154–1168. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2016-0021
