SUMMONING NOTARIES BY PROSECUTORS AFTER THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NUMBER 16/PUU-XVIII/2020
Main Article Content
Sri Sulistyawati
Kartina Pakpahan
Sartika Sari
In carrying out their duties and authorities, notaries are given legal protection as in Article 66 paragraph 1 of Law Number 2 of 2014 (UUJN). In the Constitutional Court Decision No.16/PUU-XVIII/2020, the judge rejected the lawsuit of the plaintiff PJI (Indonesian Prosecutors Association) on the basis that the plaintiff did not have legal standing. This study aims to analyze the Constitutional Court Decision No.16/PUU-XVIII/2020 regarding the examination and summoning of Notaries by the Prosecutor. This research, normative legal research, is conducted with a statute approach using the theory of authority, namely by reviewing and analyzing regulations related to the legal issues being addressed. The results show that the decision provides special protection to the duties of Notary, but also weakens the position of the Prosecutor in summoning the Notary. Article 66 of the UUJN overlaps with Article 1 paragraph (2) of the Prosecutor's Office Law which authorizes the Prosecutor as a Civil Servant with a functional position that has the specificity to carry out its duties, functions and authorities based on the law. Efforts need to be made by Prosecutors and Investigators to prevent and eradicate criminal acts involving Notaries without violating human rights and the rights of Notaries regulated by law.
Adjie. 2017. Memahami Majelis Pengawas Notaris (MPN) Dan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris (MKN). Edited by Sumayyah Dinah. Kesatu. Bandung: PT.Refika Aditama.
Carrillo, Jo. 2007. “Links and Choices: Popular Legal Culture in the Work of Lawrence M. Friedman.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 17 (1): 1–22. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1139342.
Endah Sumiarti, Djodi Suranto, Yennie. 2015. “Fungsi Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Ditinjau Dalam Perspektif Pelindungan Jabatan Notaris Dan Kepentingan Umum.” Pakuan Law Revieww Review 1 (2): 139–214. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/palar/article/view/936/796.
Hably, Rio Utomo, and Gunawan Djajaputra. 2019. “Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Hal Membuat Akta Partij (Contoh Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 1003 K/Pid/2015).” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 2 (2): 482. https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i2.6562.
Hermawan, Udi, and Munsyarif Abdul Chalim. 2017. “Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Wilayah Dalam Memberikan Persetujuan Terhadap Pemanggilan Notaris Oleh Penegak Hukum.” Jurnal Akta 4 (3): 449. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v4i3.1820.
Indriani, Desi. 2016. “Criminal Law Policy to Limitation Authority Investigations on Notary.” Fiat Justicia, Sinta 2 10 (1): 149–74. https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/fiat/article/view/656/631.
Indroharto. 1993. Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. 1st ed. Jakarta: Pustaka harapan.
KBBI. 2023. “Kamus Versi Online/Daring Dalam Jaringan.” In . https://kbbi.web.id/profesi.
Manan, Bagir, and Susi Dwi Harijanti. 2016. “Konstitusi Dan Hak Asasi Manusia.” Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sinta 2 3 (3): 448–67. https://journal.unpad.ac.id/pjih/article/viewFile/11606/5428.
Maya, Evi Apita. 2017. “Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Pembinaan Terhadap Notaris.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, Sinta 2 5 (2): 245. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v5i2.455.
Nugraha, Moeh Angga. 2021. “Persetujuan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Atas Pemanggilan Notaris Dalam Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Officium Notarium 1 (2): 403–13. https://doi.org/10.20885/jon.vol1.iss2.art20.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2010. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. 3rd ed. Jakarta: Universitas Indnesia.
Ramadhani, Dian, Rodliyah Rodliyah, and Djumardin Djumardin. 2020. “The Obligation of Notary to Prevent and Eradicate Criminal Acts of Money Laundering.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 7 (5): 367–77. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i5.1688.
Ramiyanto, Ramiyanto. 2018. “Presidential Permit to Summon Suspect of Corruption of the Member of the House of Representatives.” Sriwijaya Law Review 2 (2): 203. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol2.iss2.128.pp203-214.
Redi, Ahmad, and Shintamy Nesyicha Syahril. 2020. “The Institutional Position of the Corruption Eradication Commission Based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 36/PUU-XV/ 2017 in Terms of the State Institutional Structure” 478 (Ticash): 141–46. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.018.
Saleh. 1981. “Hukum Acara Perdata (H.I.R/R.B.G).” In , keempat. Jakarta Timur: Ghalia Indonesia.
Salim. 2019. Penerapan Dan Teori Hukum Pada Penelitian Tesis Dan Disertasi. 1,cetakan ed. Jakarta: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada.
Salinan Putusan Banding Nomor: 446/Pid/2017/PTMDN, Putusan No.203/Pid.b/2017/PN.Mdn. 2017. Medan. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/.
Salinan Putusan No.16/PUU-XVIII/. 2020. https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_6887.
Salinan Putusan No.346/Pid.B/2015/PN.Kpn. n.d. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/.
Suherman, Andi. 2019. “Implementasi Independensi Hakim Dalam Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum 1 (1): 42–51. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i1.29.
Supriyadi. 2006. “Etika Dan Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum.” In , 1st ed., 20. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Undang-Undang kejaksaan. 2004. Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Tambahan Lembaran Negara RI Nomor 4401.
Undang-Undang Kejaksaan. 2021. Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2021 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia. Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6755.
Undang-Undang Kepolisian. 2002. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
Undang-undang No.8. 1981. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 76 Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 3209.
UUJN. 2014. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Undang- Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5491.
Vika Rochmawati. 2021. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Judicial Review Undang Undang Terhadap UUD 1945.” Unisla Skripsi (53): 62211. http://eprints.unisla.ac.id/173/.
Waltemath, Charles. 2007. “Judicial Review.” Economist 385 (8552): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.14393/rfadir-50.2.2022.65622.333-353.
Widiatmoko. 2007. Himpunan Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Jakarta.
Yetniwati. 2021. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Penerima Protokol: Bentuk Dan Batasan.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 4 (1): 213–44. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.1.213-244.
Yustica, Anugrah, Ngadino Ngadino, and Novira Maharani Sukma. 2019. “Peran Etika Profesi Notaris Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum.” Notarius 13 (1): 60–71. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i1.29162.
Zoelva, Hamdan. 2012. “Constitutional Complaint Constitutional Question and Protection of Citizen’s Constitutional Rights.” Jurnal Media Hukum, Google Scholar 19 (1): 152–65. http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/1984.
