ANALYSIS OF JOB DEMANDS AND SELF-EFFICACY ON JOB SATISFACTION WITH WORK ENGAGEMENT AS AN INTERVENING VARIABLE IN PT. METROMATIKA TEKNOLOGI REKAYASA MEDAN
Main Article Content
Shivi Almas
Muhammad Isa Hendrawan
The purpose of this study was to identify and analyze the direct and indirect effects of work demands and self-efficacy variables on job satisfaction through work involvement as an intervening variable for employees of PT. Metromatika Teknologi Rekayasa Medan. The analysis used is associative analysis, this research method is quantitative. The population in this study are all employees at PT. Metromatika Teknologi Rekayasa Medan totaling 70 people. Sampling method using nonprobability sampling method with census sampling technique. So, the sample in this study is 70 employees at PT. Metromatika Teknologi Rekayasa Medan The results obtained from this study indicate that: 1) Work demands directly have a significant effect on employee work involvement at PT. Metromatika Teknologi Rekayasa Medan, 2) Self-efficacy directly has a significant effect on employee work involvement at PT. Metromatika Teknologi Rekayasa Medan. 3) Work involvement directly has a significant effect on employee job satisfaction at PT. Metromatika Teknologi Rekayasa Medan, 4) Work demands do not directly influence significantly the job satisfaction of employees PT. Metromatika Teknologi Rekayasa Medan, 5) Self-efficacy has a significant direct effect on employee job satisfaction at PT. Metromatika Teknologi Rekayasa Medan, 6) Job demands indirectly have a significant effect on job satisfaction through the involvement of employees at PT. Metromatika Teknologi Rekayasa Medan, 7) Self-efficacy indirectly has a significant effect on job satisfaction through employee involvement at PT. Metromatika Teknologi Rekayasa Medan. In substructure I, the Adjusted R square value of 0.617 can be called the coefficient of determination, this means that 0.617 (61.7%) work involvement can be obtained and explained by work demands and self-efficacy while the remaining 38.3% (100% - 61.7 % = 38.3%) explained by variables outside the model that were not examined. In substructure II, the Adjusted R square value of 0.797 can be called the coefficient of determination, this means that 0.797 (79.7%) work involvement can be obtained and explained by work demands and self-efficacy while the remaining 20.3% (100% - 79.7 % = 20.3%) explained by variables outside the model that were not examined.
Afandi. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori, Konsep dan Indikator). Riau: Zanafa Publishing
Anoraga, P. (2014), Manajemen Bisnis, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
A.A. Mangkunegara. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Aspan, et.al (2020) Individual Characteristics and Job Characteristics on Work Effectiveness in the State-Owned Company: The Moderating Effect of Emotional Intelligence. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. Volume 13, Issue 6, 2020.
Badeni. (2013). Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Organisasi. Bandung: Alfabeta. BPFE.
Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2013). Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Journal Work & Stress, 22(3), 187-300.
Benthal, P., Wellins, R.S., and Phelps, M. (2015). Employee Engagement: The Key to Realizing Competitive Advantage. Development Dimensions International, Inc
Bandura, A., (2015), Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change, Psycologycal Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Darmawan, D. (2013). Sistem Informasi Manajemen. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Dessler, G. (2012). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Alih bahasa: Eli Tanya. Penyunting Bahasa: Budi Supriyanto. Jakarta: Indeks.
Efendi, S. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Feist & J. Feist, (2014). Teori Kepribadian. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Ghozali. (2014). Aplikasi analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit UNDIP, Semarang.
Gibson, J. Jhon, M., Ivancevich., & H., Donnelly., Jr. (2014). Organisasi dan Manajemen, Perilaku, Struktur, dan Proses. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Handoko, T. H. (2014). Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta.
Hasibuan, M. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.
Herminingsih, D. I., & Isro'iyah, L. (2023). The Metadiscourse Analysis in Abstracts of Multidisciplinary Sciences Journal Articles: Hedges vs Boosters. International Linguistics Research, 6(1), p24-p24.
Isro'iyah, L., & Herminingsih, D. I. (2023). Teaching Culture of Others through English Literature: English. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 5(2), 136-146.
Kahn, W. A. (2014). Psychological Conditions Of Personal Engagement And Disengagement At Work. Academy of Management Journal Vol 33
Kasmir. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Teori dan Praktik). Cetakan ke-1. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kaswan. (2017). Pengembangan Manajemen Mempersiapkan dan Mengembangkan calon dan Manajer yang Efektif. Cetakan ke-1. Bandung: Alfabeta
Moeheriono. (2012). Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Prabowo, A. (2023). Determinan Peningkatan Kepuasan Pelanggan Pada PT. Mondelez Internasional Medan. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Manajemen Prima, 4 (2), 83-97.
Prabowo, A., Wahyuni, E. S., Bakti, S., Sari, P. B., & Rossanty, Y. (2022). Does Raising Environmental Awareness and Creating Pro-Environmental Attitudes Drive the Intention to Revisit Among Visitors? Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(3).
Priansa, D. J. (2014). Perencanaan & Pengembangan SDM. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rivai, V. & Sagala. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan dari Teori ke Praktik. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.
Robbins, P. S. (2017). Organizational Behaviour, Edisi 13. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Rusiadi, dkk. (2014). Metode Penelitian. Medan: USU Press.
Santi, S. & Prabowo, A. (2023). Pengaruh Stress Kerja Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Dengan Work Engagement Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Manajemen Prima, 4 (2), 98-110.
Sedarmayanti. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Refika
Siagian, S. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Sunyoto, D. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Center for Academic Publishing Service.
Sutrisno, E. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. cetakan ke-5. Jakarta: Kencana.
Tasmara, T. (2016). Membudayakan Etos Kerja. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.
Uchjana, O. (2013). Komunikasi Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Wirawan. (2012). Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia: Teori Aplikasi dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Wulandari, F. (2021). Middle Range Theory Dalam Ilmu Manajemen SDM. Yogyakarta: CV. Gerbang Media Aksara.
