Application of Agent-Based Model in Financial Risk Assessment: A New Perspective in Risk Management

Authors

  • Raden Rudi Alhempi Universitas Persada Bunda Indonesia
  • Supot Rattanapun Rajamangala University of Technology Krungthep, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54443/sinomika.v4i1.3475

Keywords:

Agent-Based Models, Financial Risk Assessment, Systemic Risk, Market Volatility

Abstract

Financial risk management plays a crucial role in ensuring the stability and resilience of financial markets. Traditional models, such as Value at Risk (VaR) and Monte Carlo simulations, have been widely used to assess risks; however, they often fail to account for complex, dynamic interactions between market participants. This paper explores the application of Agent-Based Models (ABMs) as an innovative approach to financial risk assessment. ABMs simulate the interactions between heterogeneous agents, such as investors, banks, and regulators, providing a more realistic representation of financial systems. The study highlights the strengths of ABMs in capturing systemic risks, non-linear dynamics, and emergent phenomena like market crashes, herd behavior, and contagion. The results demonstrate that ABMs can enhance the understanding of financial risk by modeling individual behaviors and their impact on market stability. Through simulation experiments, the paper shows how ABMs can complement traditional risk management tools by providing deeper insights into the systemic nature of financial crises. The findings suggest that ABMs offer valuable advantages over conventional models, particularly in assessing market volatility and the resilience of financial institutions. This research contributes to the growing body of literature advocating for the integration of ABMs into financial risk management frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Battiston, S., Delli Gatti, D., & Gallegati, M. (2012). Liaisons dangereuses: Increasing connectivity, risk sharing, and systemic risk. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(8), 1121-1141.

Brock, W. A., & Hommes, C. H. (1997). A rational route to randomness. Econometrica, 65(5), 1059-1095.

Brock, W. A., & Hommes, C. H. (1998). Heterogeneous beliefs and economic dynamics: It’s not always rational to be rational. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 22(6), 1235-1274.

Cassing, J. H. (1993). An agent-based model of financial market behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 20(3), 303-317.

Deissenberg, C., & van der Hoog, S. (2008). How to model financial crises: Agent-based modeling approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Complex Systems.

Farmer, J. D., & Foley, D. (2010). The economy needs agent-based modeling. Nature, 460(7256), 685-686.

Gintis, H., & Bowles, S. (2005). The Evolution of Human Cooperation. MIT Press.

Glasserman, P. (2004). Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering (Vol. 53). Springer.

Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1999). Foundations of Incomplete Contracts. Oxford University Press.

Helbing, D., & Vicsek, T. (2000). Optimal self-organization. New Journal of Physics, 2(1), 17-17.

Hommes, C. H. (2006). Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. Handbook of Computational Economics, 2, 1109-1186.

Hommes, C. H., & Sorger, G. (1998). The stability of rational expectations equilibria under adaptive learning: Some computational experiments. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 22(3), 555-580.

Hommes, C. H., Lux, T., & Stroe, L. (2005). An empirical study of the relationship between liquidity, herding behavior, and market crashes. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 29(9), 1515-1537.

Iori, G., Moro, E., & Precup, O. (2008). A microstructure model for the study of systemic risk. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(2), 589-600.

Jorion, P. (2007). Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk. McGraw-Hill.

Kirman, A. (1992). Whom or what does the representative agent represent? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(2), 117-136.

Lane, D. C., & Maxfield, R. (2005). System dynamics from the perspective of complexity theory. System Dynamics Review, 21(3), 251-257.

LeBaron, B. (2006). Agent-based modeling of financial markets. Handbook of Computational Economics, 2, 1187-1235.

Lux, T. (2009). The empirical facts in finance and economics: Agent-based modeling and the analysis of financial markets. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 16(1), 1-25.

Lux, T., & Marchesi, M. (1999). Scaling and criticality in a stochastic multi-agent model of a financial market. Nature, 397(6719), 498-500.

Minsky, H. P. (1982). Inflation, Recession, and Economic Policy. Springer.

Sargent, T. J. (2014). Macroeconomic theory. Princeton University Press.

Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Norton & Company.

Schuermann, T. (2004). What do we know about loss given default? Economic Policy Review, 10(2), 1-17.

Taylor, J. B. (2009). The Financial Crisis and the Policy Responses: An Empirical Analysis of What Went Wrong. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.

Wolfram, S. (2002). A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media.

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Rudi Alhempi, R., & Rattanapun, S. (2025). Application of Agent-Based Model in Financial Risk Assessment: A New Perspective in Risk Management. SINOMIKA Journal: Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi, 4(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.54443/sinomika.v4i1.3475

Issue

Section

Articles