THE DOUBLE BIND OF FEMININITY: THE LIKEABILITY PENALTY AND THE COMPETENCE–ATTRACTIVENESS PARADOX AMONG WORKING WOMEN IN MEDAN
DOI:
10.54443/sibatik.v4i12.3943Published:
2025-11-30Downloads
Abstract
Women in the formal workforce often face a double bind dilemma, where the need to demonstrate competence conflicts with expectations of femininity. This study analyzes the influence of the likeability penalty and the competence–attractiveness paradox on promotion opportunities and work engagement among female employees in Medan. A quantitative explanatory design was applied, with data from 100 respondents selected through purposive sampling. A five-point Likert scale questionnaire was used, and data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (SEM-PLS). Results indicate that the likeability penalty negatively affects promotion opportunities (β = -0.296; p = 0.008), while the competence–attractiveness paradox has a dual effect: positively influencing perceived competence (β = 0.318; p = 0.004) but negatively affecting promotion opportunities (β = -0.211; p = 0.029). Promotion opportunities significantly improve work engagement (β = 0.427; p = 0.000). These findings underscore persistent gender bias, aligning with Role Congruity Theory, and highlight the need for competence-based promotion policies.
Keywords:
Double Bind Dilemma Likeability Penalty Competence–Attractiveness Paradox Promotion Opportunities Work EngagementReferences
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 789–865.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135.
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81–92.
Johnson, S. K., Podratz, K. E., Dipboye, R. L., & Gibbons, E. (2010). Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: Tracking down the “beauty is beastly” effect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(3), 301–318.
Livingston, R. W., Rosette, A. S., & Washington, E. F. (2012). Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychological Science, 23(4), 354–358.
Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Walker, L. S., & Woehr, V. E. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1129–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036751
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, L. A. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92..
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Triana Melinda Sinaga, Silvia Sofyan, Ferry Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
