PERFORMANCE OF THE REGIONAL SECRETARIAT GENERAL BUREAU OF CENTRAL SULAWESI PROVINCE
Main Article Content
This study aims to determine how the performance of the General Bureau of the Regional Secretariat of Central Sulawesi Province. In this study researchers used the theory of Moeheriono (2012: 162-163) which consists of criteria of Responsiveness (responsiveness), Responsibility (responsibility) and Accountability (accountability). The research method used is a qualitative descriptive research type. Data collection was carried out using observation, documentation, and interview methods. The determination and number of informants in this study are parties who are considered to know in depth various matters concerning research problems totaling 5 (five) people. While data analysis techniques include data collection, data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawing/verification. The results of this study show that the performance of the General Bureau of the Regional Secretariat of Central Sulawesi Province has not run optimally, this is due to the non-achievement of performance indicators used in this study such as aspects of responsiveness that have not been maximized due to Human Resources within the scope of the General Bureau of the Regional Secretariat of Central Sulawesi Province which is still limited, especially in the placement of executive positions not in accordance with the competence of employees in the agency in carrying out its duties. The aspect of responsibility has not run optimally due to frequent delays in completing tasks due to frequent procrastination of work, the accountability aspect has been running well in the application of the Core Values of ASN BerAKHLAK but still needs to be socialized again, considering that these values are new things that need to be applied and used as guidelines for the implementation of duties by each ASN in providing services.
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2010, Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Rineka Cipta, jakarta
Hasibuan, Malayu SP,2002. manajemen dasar, Pengertian dan Masalah, CV Haji Masagung, Jakarta.
Hessel, Nogi S, Tangkilisan. 2005. Manajemen Publik. Jakarta: Gramedia Widia Sarana Indonesia.
Ibrahim, Amin. 2008. Teori Dan Konsep Pelayanan Publik Serta Implementasinya. Bandung: Mandar Maju
Milles, Matheaw B, dan Huberman A. Michael (terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi, 2014). Analisa Data Kualitatif UI Press. Jakarta
Moeheriono. 2012. Indikator Kinerja Utama (IKU). Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Moeleong, Lexy.J, 2002, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Nomor 53 Tahun 2014 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perjanjian Kinerja, Pelaporan Kinerja dan Tata Cara Reviu atas Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi
Ruky, Achmad, S. 2001. Sistem Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sarwoto, 2004. Dasar-Dasar Organisasi dan Manajemen. Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta.
Singarimbun, Masri dan Effendi, Sofian, 2002. Methode Penelitian Survey, Cetakan II, Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia,
Sugiyono, 2005. Methode Penelitian Administrasi, Bandung: Alfabeta,
Sudirman dan Teguh Widjinarko, 2001. Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. LAN RI. Jakarta.
Undang-undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara
Undang-undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintah Daerah
Wibowo. 2012. Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.