KEPASTIAN HUKUM BAGI KORBAN PENIPUAN JUAL BELI TANAH YANG BERSERTIPIKAT HAK MILIK: STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 873/PID/2021/PT SBY
DOI:
10.54443/sibatik.v5i3.4463Published:
2026-02-09Downloads
Abstract
Land fraud involving certified ownership titles poses significant threats to legal certainty in Indonesia, with cases surging from 4,000 in 2021 to nearly 8,000 in 2025 per Ministry of ATR/BPN data. Enforcement under Article 378 of the Criminal Code prioritizes imprisonment over victim restitution, as evident in High Court Decision No. 873/Pid/2021/PT SBY, leaving victims without full recovery. This study aims to analyze legal certainty for victims of certified land sale fraud and propose restorative justice enhancements. It employs normative juridical research with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The population comprises relevant laws, doctrines, and court decisions; purposive sampling selects the aforementioned decision, KUHP Article 378, KUHAP Article 98, and supporting literature. Primary data from regulations and secondary from books/journals are analyzed qualitatively via description, classification, and legal syllogism. Findings reveal inadequate restitution integration, resulting in partial justice and prison overcrowding. In conclusion, restitution should be mandated as principal punishment in property crimes to balance retribution and restoration.
Keywords:
Criminal Code Land Fraud Legal Certainty Restorative Justice Victim RestitutionReferences
Alber Manurung, H. S. (n.d.). Peran Kepolisian Daerah Kalimantan Barat dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana penipuan jual beli obyek tanah.
Ayu, R., & Nur, S. (n.d.). Pertanggungjawaban Badan Pertanahan Nasional dalam penerbitan sertifikat hak milik ganda dan implikasinya terhadap kepastian hukum, 2018-2026.
Christanto, F. H. (n.d.). Tinjauan yuridis terhadap tindak pidana penipuan jual beli rumah berdasarkan Pasal 378.
Efendi, E. (2022). Penjatuhan pidana ganti rugi sebagai pidana pokok dalam kejahatan terhadap harta benda. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(2), 618–632. https://journals.usm.ac.id/index.php/julr/article/view/5355
Hiariej, E. O. (n.d.). Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana.
Mulyadi, D. (2017). Unsur-unsur penipuan dalam Pasal 378 KUHP dikaitkan dengan jual beli tanah. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi, 5(2), 206–223.
Roby, W., & Bahrul. (n.d.). Tindak pidana pemalsuan surat atau dokumen dalam penerbitan sertifikat hak milik atas tanah.
Sadiqin, H. B. (n.d.). Analisis yuridis tindak pidana penipuan terhadap calon karyawan pabrik PT CING LU Kabupaten Tangerang.
Soekanto, S. (n.d.). Pokok-pokok sosiologi hukum. PT Raja Grafindo.
Tomalili, M. D. (n.d.). Hukum pidana. Mitra Wacana Media.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Pasal 378–395).
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (Pasal 95 & 98).
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 1847 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Waluyo, B. (n.d.). Penyelesaian perkara pidana: Penerapan keadilan restoratif dan transformatif. Sinar Grafika.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dimas Bayu Sangaji, Wahyu Prawesthi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
