Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): April
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Keadilan Kontraktual dalam Fidusia Digital: Tantangan Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Generasi Z dalam Ekosistem Pembiayaan Berbasis Kontrak Baku

Authors

Walid Supendi , Muhamad Hasan Muaziz

Published:

2026-04-30

Downloads

Abstract

The digital transformation of Indonesia's financing systems has driven the adoption of electronic fiduciary guarantees, particularly in consumer transactions involving Generation Z as primary debtors. While this digitalization promises service efficiency and speed—facilitated by Government Regulation No. 21 of 2015—its practical application raises serious challenges regarding contractual fairness and legal protection for debtors. Digital fiduciary agreements typically rely on standard contracts accepted electronically with no room for negotiation, creating a structural imbalance between creditors and debtors; the latter remain legally vulnerable despite their apparent technological savvy. Although the digital fiduciary system procedurally satisfies the principles of publicity and specialty—as affirmed by Constitutional Court Ruling No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019—its implementation often overlooks substantive transparency. Electronic fiduciary certificates lack detailed information, debtor consent is often merely formal rather than fully informed, and the execution of collateral is frequently carried out unilaterally, in contravention of the Constitutional Court's ruling.

Keywords:

Digital Fiduciary Guarantee Contractual Fairness Standard-Form Contract Generation Z

References

Ahu, Layanan, Kantor Notaris, Fifi Rahmayanti, M Kn, and Ari Leonardo. “Kelebihan Dan Kekurangan Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Melalui Sistem” 3, no. 1 (2025): 41–54.

Akbar, Abiandri Fikri. “Peran Notaris Pada Pembuatan Akta Jaminan Fidusia Dengan Objek Jaminan Berupa Hak Cipta” 3, no. May (2023).

Aminah, Siti, Dedi Setiyadi, and Universitas Trunojoyo Madura. “PROGREMATIKA PENERAPAN PENDAFTARAN JAMINAN” 2, no. 6 (2024).

Covid-, D I Masa Pandemi, Debbi Puspito, and Edy Santoso. “MODEL PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR LAYANAN PINJAM MEMINJAM UANG BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI MODEL OF LEGAL PROTECTION FOR CREDITOR OF FINTECH LENDING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC” 14 (2022): 11–23.

Doktor, Program, Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Brawijaya. “Makna Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Menurut Hukum Indonesia Disertasi,” 2018.

Hidayat, Muhammad Fahri, U I N Kiai, Haji Achmad, and Siddiq Jember. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dirampasnya Objek Jaminan Yang Digunakan Sebagai Alat Kejahatan” 2, no. 2 (2024): 179–94.

Indira, Wahyu, Purnawi Putra, and Gunawan Djajaputra. “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Atas Wanprestasi Perjanjian Kredit Yang Dilakukan Oleh Debitur Dalam Hal Jaminan Disita Pihak Lain” 6, no. 1 (2024): 480–92.

Indonesia, Republik. “Presiden Republik Indonesia,” 1999.

Irawan, Faiqa Syifa. “Keseimbangan Hak Dan Kewajiban Para Pihak Dalam Hukum Kontrak,” no. April (2025).

Jaminan, Pendaftaran, Fidusia Dan, and Biaya Pembuatan. “No Title,” 2015.

Jaudah, Tsuroyyaa Maitsaa. “Problematika Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia Melalui Sistem AHU Online,” n.d., 180–88.

Lppm, Jurnal, Bidang Ekososbudkum, K U H Perdata, K U H Perdata, K U H Perdata, U U No, U U No, et al. “Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum Volume 1 Nomor 2 Tahun 2014” 1 (2014): 56–70.

No, Vol, Dalam Sistem, and Hukum Di. “Jurnal Prisma Hukum Jurnal Prisma Hukum” 9, no. 1 (2025): 54–62.

Penarikan, Praktik, Sepihak Oleh, and Perusahaan Pembiayaan. “Https://Journaledutech.Com/Index.Php/Grea” 1 (2025): 831–39.

Perspektif, Dalam, and Undang-undang Jaminan Fidusia. Hukum Jaminan, n.d.

Privatum, Lex. “Lex Privatum , Vol.I/No.2/Apr-Jun/2013,” no. 2 (2013): 1–18.

Riskawati, Shanti, and Universitas Brawijaya. “PERUBAHAN KONSTRUKSI NORMA EKSEKUSI DAN WANPRESTASI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM” 5 (2021): 33–48.

Singh, Rakhbir, and Taufiqurrohman Syahur. “Teori Kedaulatan Rakyat Berdasarkan Konstitusi” 2, no. 7 (2023): 31–40.

Sitorus, Fiter Jonson. “Pendaftaran Objek Fidusia Sebagai Jaminan Utang” 1, no. 1 (2022): 11–21. https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v1i1.32.

Wilianita, Ani, Yuniar Rahmatiar, and Muhamad Abas. “Akibat Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Secara Elektronik ( Online ) Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia” 4, no. 6 (2024): 2799–2811.

Yuaga, Nugraha Endi, and Nanik Trihastuti. “Jaminan Fidusia Sebagai Jaminan Kebendaan Yang Memberi Hak Mendahulu Dalam Perolehan Pelunasan Utang” 5, no. 5 (2025): 3779–85.

Author Biographies

Walid Supendi, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Muhamad Hasan Muaziz, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Supendi, W., & Hasan Muaziz, M. (2026). Keadilan Kontraktual dalam Fidusia Digital: Tantangan Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Generasi Z dalam Ekosistem Pembiayaan Berbasis Kontrak Baku. LexUnus: Jurnal Hukum Nasional Terintegrasi, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47353/lexunus.v1i1.4355